Christian spirituality and ethics are based on two tenets: belief in God and objective morality. Any Christian’s viewpoint or opinion would look to the Bible as its primary source. The written revelation of God is often known as the Bible. This is where postmodern relativist theory and medical practice diverge most strongly. Postmodernism is based on the idea that truth and objective reality do not exist. It is hard to think of a concept like this when health therapy is based on facts and solid information regarding illness and disease (Brush, 2021). Furthermore, the medical community works tirelessly to enhance patient outcomes by using data and research to guide practice.

The Christian worldview is consistently moral because it is grounded on the experiences of real people. It exemplifies everything that is contrary to postmodern relativism. To describe the negative reaction to postmodern relativism, researchers Braun & Potgieter (2019) coined the term “value vacuum disorder.” Do you think people and societies are never satisfied with the status quo and never stop searching for more stable ideals and fundamental truths by which to ground themselves? Because healthcare is grounded in reality in some way, it can be challenging to apply postmodern relativist theories to the field. When a patient is asked to describe their own experiences, their subjective accounts are taken seriously. However, providing treatment based on relativist assumptions is neither rational nor moral because such beliefs lack facts and have no connection to reality.

Scientism

Scientism is the belief that all of life’s fundamental problems can be solved via scientific inquiry. For scientists, the ultimate existence and significance of the universe are up to speculation. Christians do not warmly embrace science since it does not account for the phenomena described in the Bible’s account of the beginning of all humankind and the universe (Mazur, 2021). One can argue that Prayer doesn’t work because all that is real are natural objects stretched in a compact chronological space-time framework or that God exists and is a unique creation stretched in space-time, engaging logically with other objects in nature.

Christians tend to downplay the importance of the scientific method. Scientism has few effects on religious belief (Potgieter, 2019). The possibility that God does not exist is abhorrent to Christians. And the idea that God can be found in nature was broadened. Christians generally do not support or even like the idea of space travel. I think it is excellent that there is such a noticeable difference between Christianity, scientism, and the natural sciences. While scientific inquiry leaves room for the possibility of an “other” explanation, the scientism that has come to dominate our culture is fixated on finding a scientific explanation for everything (Roy, 2019).

In the hard sciences, long-held beliefs that have been disproved by subsequent research are not subject to revision as new evidence emerges. This means that data from both the social and natural sciences are susceptible to revision when new evidence becomes available. However, since subjectivism is central to the study of “soft” sciences, it is not unusual for researchers to arrive at contradictory conclusions about the same principle.

My Personal Perspective and Worldview On:

Ultimate Reality

This idea that we are all a sum of our experiences in the world is what we consider to be the ultimate reality. My upbringing and experiences in life have shaped me into who I am. My upbringing has been shaped by many different influences, all of which have contributed to the beliefs, habits, and ways of thinking that I currently hold. Since the two theological beliefs have different conceptions of the number of spouses in a lawful marriage, I would be even more accepting of polygamy if I were a Muslim. If I were a Christian, I would be less accepting. Consequently, the study of ultimate reality considers the impact of personal encounters on rationale, choice, and worldview.

Human Beings

One definition of a human being is “any living entity with a soul.” There are many ways for humans to interact with each other, such as through the use of different languages and sign systems. I believe that every person has the capacity to enjoy life. I also think that after individuals have reached a certain level of self-awareness, whether through religion or some other means, they choose a focal point from which to build a guiding principle. From my perspective,


Work with us at nursingstudyhub, and help us set you up for success with your nursing school homework and assignments, as we encourage you to become a better nurse. Your satisfaction is our goal


Claim your 20% discount!